Month: August 2007

Open Source : The Missing Touch On The Desktop

Posted by – August 16, 2007

For many years now people have claimed that the following year would be the year when Linux finally makes headway as a desktop operating system among non-geeks. Year after year no real revolution has happened – Why? …. My personal opinion on this is divided into two arguments…

One: It won’t be a revolution … It will be a small change, like what is happening with the Mozilla browser, that spawned from Netscape long ago and went through a lot of years, when only geeks embraced it and when non-geeks always took the safe choice that was handed over to them: Internet Explorer. Then the Mozilla Browser suite became Firefox and slowly more people started using it – and over a series of many years have grown into 10-15% market share and in some areas a lot more. The same will happen when we talk about Linux. It won’t happen from one year to the next. There might be year when Linux grows more than others, like when Microsoft releases an expensive, ressource-consuming, over-hyped operating system like Vista, but that won’t mean that Linux will be a Desktop alternative next year… It will happen in small, incrementing steps! The reason why everyone seems to think that it should happen from one year to the other is the fantastic speed of which Linux spread across the server segment of the market. It surprised even Microsoft, who simply wasn’t ready for that competition. Suddenly they had a competitor who’s method and support they couldn’t comprehend. They learned from their mistakes and now they are taking the server market back one step at a time – now it is a real competition between two sides. Naturally Microsoft is not about to let the same thing happen to their primary market, The Desktop. Does anyone think that they wouldn’t try to counter every attack the open source movement does when they have tried how it is like to suddenly see 80% of the server market in the hands of a competitor they didn’t expect? … They are ready now and you can see it in many of their counterattack, like their rushed launched of the “Open” Office XML format to combat the ODF format. They do not want an even competition – of course they won’t – would you?… Expect Linux to grow in the Desktop market, but don’t expect the revolution… It will happen slowly day by day!

Two: In some areas open source still needs the last touch of user-friendliness and professionalism. An example is video players… The only real solid open source video player is VLC, which is still leagues behind Microsoft Media Player or Crystal Player. Miro Player is slowly getting to become interesting, but it is not ready for prime time yet. Games is also a path where the open source world is far behind. Some open source projects are interesting like Planeshift, but lets face it: There is many thousand leagues until we get gamers to leave the Windows platform for good. One of the reason is that people failed to realize what Microsoft was doing with DirectX until OpenGL suddenly wasn’t the prime standard of graphics and the open source world had no combined open standard for all the game development needs like DirectX has become with both sound, media, graphics and more. OpenML is finally out, but it has a long way to go if it wants to compete for real against DirectX in the game development industry.

The worst aspect of running the number one open source operating system, Linux, is the difficulty in getting hardware to work properly – and here I don’t just mean to not crash – but really take advantage of all the ones hardware can perform. Linux works great on older hardware, but that’s not good enough for gamers or for companies that doesn’t want to pay for something they are not getting value from. In many ways Linux misses the final touch that makes it “just work” and in many areas need applications that look and feel more professional so that people really feel that they are getting something that are equal to or surpasses that of the equivalent Windows application. I know, I know… “Ubuntu – Everyone can use it – even my grandpa!”… Yeah, but boot up Ubuntu on a laptop. How much works flawlessly? Start the start-menu and open a couple of applications… Then open of a couple of the equivalent applications on Windows… Which looks most professional? It simply needs the final touches – and even better: it needs to outdo its Windows competitor! A shining example of this is amaroKThe best music player there is! Everyone who has tried it knows that the Windows platform needs this application… It is simply the best in its class – pure and simple!

When I hear people talking about open source I always hear the wonders of OpenOffice.org… Well, I am fairly impressed compared to a lot of the competition and I use it myself, even though I have Microsoft Office 2003 Prof. on CD. Still, for the average user it will do fine – but it needs those final touches! It needs speed – it needs consistency … And above all: It needs awesome features that Microsoft Office doesn’t have! Try out Microsoft Office 2003 and onward, try out Corel Office … Then try OpenOffice.org and you instantly get the feel that it is too much copy-cat, too little innovation and especially too much ineffective Java-code and a massive application that doesn’t dance very lightly. Wouldn’t it be awesome if it felt twice as fast as Microsoft Office? Then professionals would have a real argument for putting it in a company. Wouldn’t it be awesome if it had a series of features that wouldn’t hit Microsoft Office for another couple of years and everyone was just talking about? … Well, there is a long way to go yet!

Final Words: Open source has made some wonderful achievements and I use a lot of it in my home, but the revolution won’t come tumbling down on us next year, but rather slowly climb the long climb onto the fields of competition, while Microsoft do all they can to stop it – fair tricks or not… If anyone wants to hasten up the process a bit they can ensure that open source has a wonderful, best-of-breed application in all areas, giving the many interesting projects some help and especially making them archive that final touch of professionalism! Stop bad mouthing, Microsoft – Instead: Grab a keyboard and start coding, drawing, designing and especially innovating!

Linux

The Console War : The Truth Behind The Wii’s Magic

Posted by – August 11, 2007

I have now followed the console war for a long period of time, watched the different players come with their next-gen console and how their sales did. Nintendo seems to be a clear winner this time around, selling much more than any of the other two competitors, but also earning money from console number one. I own a Nintendo Wii myself and during the period of my ownership of this console is has become apparent what the real magic behind the Wii really is.

For some history on the Wii… Most people saw Nintend’s new console first as something not very different from the Gamecube, which wasn’t really a success, with dated graphics and not much to offer in terms of competition for Sony and Microsoft. Then they introduced their revolutionary controller to go with the Wii, which at that time was called Revolution (A name I still think is far cooler than “Wii”) and with it Wii Sports. People tried out the game and everyone was suddenly thrilled about this little wonder, who suddenly got all the good press. After the Wii was launched it quickly became apparent that it was an instant hit, selling far more than any of the other two competitors. At the same time Nintendo was in a favorable situation who, unlike Sony and Microsoft who was loosing money for every console sold, earned from every console sale from day one.

Now to my experience of the Wii and the discovery of its magic… I bought one in January and installed it – easy as nothing else. I put in Wii Sports and started playing the different sports games and was thrilled. It was really funny and a completely new experience for a hardcore gamer like myself. I had fun. Then my girlfriend tried to play Wii Sports and she had massive fun. Then my friends tried it and they had massive fun. At parties the Wii would be switched on and my guests would have fun automatically playing Wii Sports. It seemed to be a massive hit. Then naturally I had to buy a second controller and a second nunchunk – not that cheap actually… Again Nintendo was earning a lot of money here. Back to Wii Sports and now playing against a human, which was also massive fun. Then I thought that I would have some fun at some other Wii games. I took a look at the market for Wii games, which wasn’t to say the least that impressive, but hey, it had launched only three months earlier. I bought Legend of Zelda and even though it aims for a younger audience it was actually a pretty good game. Despite being an obvious Gamecube conversion it took the new controller scheme into splendid use and did it perfectly. I had fun even though the game wasn’t that cheap to buy. Then I wanted another game to continue my fun, but was suddenly stuck with no real options. There were no interesting games out there. Most of them were for kids and all of them were far too expensive being cheap conversions from the Gamecube or the PlayStation 2. I wanted something more. The Wii’s wireless network access had no uses and Nintendo still haven’t found a real use for it in games at this point – just another lost potential of the console. I then remembered the Wii Shop Channel and went in there to buy a couple of old classics like Sonic, Dr. Robotnik’s and other overpriced old games, that should cost a lot less. It was fun for a while, but not worth the money overall. Of course I had to buy a classic controller to play them, and another one to play two. Not a cheap alternative just because they don’t have a good game catalog for the console. Then I remembered Nintendo’s great sales argument that it would play all the games for the Gamecube. I looked at the selection and realized Nintendo’s big mistake. They thought that the Gamecube games would be available for all eternity. Well, guess again… Most shops have already sold the sad remains of their Gamecube games, and the all that remains here and there are sad left-overs. I then looked and looked for decent game and finally decided to try out Rogue Squadron – Rebel Strike as it was actually a great looking game (better than anything currently on their “next-gen” console, the Wii actually). I got the game and was excited to finally get a good experience with the Wii since Wii Sports, but the experience was short lived. Apparently the old gamecube games cannot use the internal memory of the Wii for some odd reason, indicating a awful oversight on the design of the machine, and I had to go out and find a memory card for the gamecube to install in my Wii. Another expensive buy… Now I had two fairly good games on my Wii and then Wii Sports. The price? The Wii console itself, two classic controllers, a gamecube memory card, a Wiimote and a Nunchuck. Not a cheap console… Then it suddenly became clear to me! Nintendo hasn’t made a revolutionary console – they have made a revolutionary game in Wii Sports and the feel and experience of Wii Sports is what is selling the Wii. That will soon become a big problem for Nintendo as there is nothing preventing their competitors in launching a similar game for their consoles and then equip it with a Wiimote-wannabe controller. My guess is that Nintendo is working overtime to make Wii Sports 2 in order to keep up the hype for a little while longer. The game catalog for the Wii is appalling and the only game I see fit for a mature audience in sight is Metroid Prime 3… Nintendo has successfully made a hype on their console using a really fun game and made everyone believe that the console is every bit as fun as Wii Sports, but the truth is quite different… Wii Sports is the Wii at this point!

Nintendo needs to get quality software into its catalog or they will find that their hype will fade like mist for the sun and fast!

Nintendo Nunchuk

The Console War : The Console Scorecard!

Posted by – August 7, 2007

For more than a year now I have been writing on various subjects on this blog. One of the areas where I wrote the most is on the subject of The Console War, concerning the next-gen console war between Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft. For those that doesn’t know where my personal opinion is let it now be clear. I prefer to play games on a PC, where I can upgrade my hardware and do the tasks I require of a PC anyway, like office, mail and programming. I like really high resolutions and the ability to change the graphical setup. I like to have at much space available as I want, when I want it – for reasonable cash. I enjoy playing with mouse and keyboard. I have a HTPC, which for me offers the complete solution. It is a powerful gaming rig, a rather silent computer, a work computer for office and programming and a PVR-solution – Everything in one. Naturally I have been concerning with the titles available on the PC platform as of late. The titles are swindling and most starts out as console exclusives, such as Halo or the upcoming Mass Effect, to ensure that console platform a solid sale, but leave the PC craving for a title that will only arrive when it is heavily outdated. For some reason the PC has become a secondary play media, not a primary – which is a shame as there is no equivalent of the box office hit, World of WarCraft, on the consoles, and properly never will be. Even though the platform seems to be forgotten or even deserted by many I stil prefer PC gaming – it is flexible and gives me the one in all solution. However, this January I gave in and bought a Wii because of one thing… It is a social gaming platform that my girlfriend, friends and occasional visitors all can join in on and have fun with. The other consoles simply doesn’t have that quality. It still hasn’t convinced me on console gaming, but it also serves a completely different purpose – It is not an alternative to my PC, but rather a funny social platform, like a board game or a card game for the family or for friends visiting…

However, having followed the console war and its major battles over the last year or so it has led me to an understanding of the different strengths and weaknesses of the different next-gen consoles as I decided whether to try a real console or not… The three consoles will be evaluated only on their strengths and weaknesses as gaming consoles, not as DVD players or HD Players or HTPC’s or whatever… I’ve got a PC for that!

Microsoft’s XBox 360

Pros: Got many titles, got 2. gen titles, got many exclusives, a working welldesigned network solution from the beginning in Live, A powerful design, HD gaming, Rumble controller…

Cons: RROD, Noise, Clumsy, Ugly external powersupply, No Harddrive, No rechargeable batteries, Proprietary Points system, No Built-in Wireless networking …

In the future: 65 nm Falcon chipset (CPU+GPU), Excellent exclusive titles such as Halo 3 and Mass Effect, Bridging PC and XBox 360 Live gaming…

Sony’s PlayStation 3

Pros: Born with a harddrive, Low noise, HD gaming, Upgradable HD…

Cons: Expensive, Inconsistent Design (CPU not designed for gaming with a last-gen graphics solution and not enough videomemory or memory all together), Few titles and not many exclusives, Too many “XBox360-conversion” titles, Unready online experience, Large, Lots of “Technology” push, Too much focus on Mediacenter rather than on Gaming Console…

In the future: Rumble controller, More titles but still no Must-have titles, 65 nm. CPU…

Nintendo’s Wii

Pros: Fun, Cheap, For-everyone, Innovative gameplay, Small, Silent

Cons: Too few titles, Too low quality in titles, No online experience, Expensive controllers, No rechargeable batteries, No HD Gaming, Proprietary Points system, No real additions in the firmware updates…

In the future: Better titles but still too few, More wacky controllers…

For the moment I can see no reason to buy a console for gaming. I am keeping my Wii for the social aspect, and might keep it if they can muster better titles and some use of the networking capabilities. I might even upgrade it if they make a HD solution for it, while keeping it small and silent, but they need better titles. If the XBox 360 keeps pushing good titles, that doesn’t make it to the PC scene the optimal solution for me is not to buy an XBox 360, but rather to start working on a emulator for a PC… Their solution is still to clumsy and noisy – and rather unstable consideration the RROD! Sony’s solution simply is too much push-technology and PC-wannabe, and not enough gaming console or good titles…

PS3